- (![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
rho) wrote in ![[site community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/comm_staff.png)
dw_accessibility2009-10-18 06:33 am
rho) wrote in dw_accessibility2009-10-18 06:33 am
Entry tags:
Need accessibility feedback over in docs
Hello wonderful accessibility team!
We're in the process of designing an entirely new FAQ system at the moment, and one of the things that I'm keen to do is make sure that we have accessibility considerations built in from the start. Unfortunately, I'm not at all knowledgeable when it comes to accessibility, so I don't know what we need to be looking at. If you could go take a look at this entry fromdw_docs where I have a first draft version of the specifications for the new system up, I'd appreciate it. I need to know:
1. What of the current spec will be bad for accessibility.
2. What of the current spec have I managed to get right, accessibility-wise.
3. What have I just not thought of at all that needs to be added in.
Thanks!
We're in the process of designing an entirely new FAQ system at the moment, and one of the things that I'm keen to do is make sure that we have accessibility considerations built in from the start. Unfortunately, I'm not at all knowledgeable when it comes to accessibility, so I don't know what we need to be looking at. If you could go take a look at this entry from
dw_docs where I have a first draft version of the specifications for the new system up, I'd appreciate it. I need to know:1. What of the current spec will be bad for accessibility.
2. What of the current spec have I managed to get right, accessibility-wise.
3. What have I just not thought of at all that needs to be added in.
Thanks!